Can I create an expiration date for passwords? If you have configured another user with the UID 0, then in this case, the root and superuser passwords are not the same. In Ubuntu, the superuser is the one with User ID 0. Changing the root password should also change the superuser password. In most cases, the root user is the same as the superuser. What is the difference between root and superuser password? The only difference now is that outsiders won't be able to just slide in and do the same themselves. You can still do it easily from grub as described above as long as you are able to gain access to the disk. How does full disk encryption affect my ability to change my root password?Īlthough encryption can complicate things when you're trying to repair a problem on Linux, this is not the case when you're trying to change the root password. If you would like to be more cautious with who has access to these sorts of privileges, you should encrypt your hard disk so that it can't be booted into or mounted easily.Īlso read: 5 Better USENET Readers for Linux Frequently Asked Questions 1. Do note that anyone who has access to your computer can use this method to reset your superuser or root password. Lastly, remove the Live CD and reboot into your Linux system.Ĭhanging the root password in Linux is easy once you get over the intimidation of the extra steps you have to take. At least the debian-image is affected.10. So none of my emmc-partitions start with the bytes printed by uboot (8c 7c f2 7c 00 00 00 00) I guess it’s last one because mmc1 block 0 is printed and not only 0Ĭan i check if the right HW-Partition is read? BPI-R64> mmc init 1 Other changes in mt7622_evb.h as far as i see are only sd-card-relevant (inside #elif defined(OFF_BOARD_SD_CARD_COMPONENT) ) Tried also with changes in config.in for emmc-support (commit above), but still unknown partition table/no mmc card found Replaced rootfs with bootstrapped rootfs from original debian buster does not show this nano-issue It should be noted that debian buster is the armbian-version not the debian basic version…maybe nano is broken there On ssh it works, tried setting same console settings, but this does not help…seems to be another problem… Isig icanon iexten echo echoe echok -echonl -noflsh -xcase -tostop -echoprt echoctl echoke -flusho -extproc Opost -olcuc -ocrnl onlcr -onocr -onlret -ofill -ofdel nl0 cr0 tab0 bs0 vt0 ff0 ignbrk brkint ignpar -parmrk -inpck -istrip -inlcr -igncr icrnl ixon -ixoff -iuclc -ixany imaxbel -iutf8 parenb -parodd -cmspar cs8 hupcl -cstopb cread -clocal -crtscts Stop = ^S susp = ^Z rprnt = ^R werase = ^W lnext = ^V discard = ^O min = 1 time = 0 Intr = ^C quit = ^\ erase = ^? kill = ^U eof = ^D eol = eol2 = swtch = start = ^Q Speed 115200 baud rows 24 columns 120 line = 0 I expect there is any wrong console setting stty -a Maybe anybody have an idea about nano (and some menus from apt/dpkg looking strange/no cursor/selection visible). On first apt update i got errors about not-yet-valid release file…this is because the system clock is wrong. dev/mmcblk1p2: LABEL="BPI-ROOT" UUID="80463388-3170-483b-ac00-378b69a7a277" TYPįstab: UUID=c1401c29-e4d8-4924-8799-8b0f3a77b79b / ext4 defaults,noatime,nodiratime,comĪfter i’ve fixed this (with vi because nano is currently unusable on serial, also tried with “resize” and changing $TERM) i got a rw-rootfs Power consumption is about 4.6w in default configuration (no pcie/wifi/bt active) while running apt upgrade (4.0w in idle)…after powerdown: 4.8w something is strange hereįirst thing i’ve noticed was readonly rootfs because of wrong uuid in /etc/fstab blkid Have now booted first time the debian buster image with new r64-board This release is for banana pi R64 board, and it is based on Ubuntu 16.04 & AArch64 Linux Lite & Debian 10 Buster Lite Operation system with kernel 4.19.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |